![]() I rarely need to export to Photoshop, unless I need to make some type of sophisticated repair etc. But coming from Lightroom and Capture one, the preset emulation and all edits are typically finalized in Lightroom and or Capture one. ![]() If there was nothing else to compare an experience to, I might not know the difference. ![]() To have to edit in Photolab then export to another program to do another edit is an incredible time waste. Yes, technically that would work but the problem I run into with that scenario really comes down to time and my edit flow. Or search for ryoanji tsukubai to help handle the situation or get mad… While we wait, we can simply use the apps that are best now (best being the one that gives you the results with the smallest effort) and see what the future brings and - not to forget - see if we like the same results in a few years time as we change with it. Maybe DxO will go that way and if they do, they’ll take smaller steps, selling intermediate versions while we wait for the wow factor doitall release. User interfaces (obviously) differ and innards too (supposedly) and it would be quite some work to bring all (including the niks) into one unified and modular software architecture. To produce equally pleasing results in both apps requires that you nudge sliders differently which is probably not worth while.Īgain, DxO markets different apps that propose different subsets of functions that help you create the results you’re aiming at. (maybe DxO Staff can elaborate this matter and explain the difference between the plugin and the standalone if there is.)Ĭomparing FP and PL is quite difficult as it seems that the two apps use different rendering algorithms and base settings. So id like to dive deeper in this question.Out of interest that is, this kind of questions triggering me to find the “why”. That’s the only difference i could think of, color depth difference, fixed WB on the one and still freely WB space on the other.īut that would be indicating that inside PL FP would be preforming better because of the wider range of color, and you said it doens’t. a image in PL with your pl preset applied and then processed in inside PL in FP tab (sRGB workspace?).a image in PL with your pl preset applied exported to FP (16bit TIFF?).If you do the same, I think you will find that there are some major differences in the results between the two.Ĭan you provide some examples in this matter? I bought Filmpack in the suite version because of the extra’s besides the film emulations so i don’t took much time to look at this specific color filter editing yet.īut i am interested in your tests and results.Īs john is, i would be assuming that if you use FP inside PL the working capabilities should be the same as wel the outcome if you don’t mess with other adjustment settings. I paid for the Elite kit and have been extensively comparing the results from Filmpack5 to Photolab. As of now, it seems to be a cluster of random tools and sophistication that is begging for refinement. But who knows? I just hope they really start to make a game plan of how to tie-in some really powerful software tools to a consumer ready, workflow package. I fear the lack of in-depth tutorials, explanation of features and how they work, and lack of any real social media presence will lead to the conclusion that DXO won’t be around long. Honestly, there are some obvious workflow and features that are missing or half-hardheartedly applied which go against every other highly intelligent features of the program… which lend to the theory. Unless DXO is an organization built around the principle of masochism, my only educated guess is they are licencing software traits from Adobe, and part of the deal is they can’t make this program too amazing. ![]() Photolab has film emulation modules -yes- but they only apply a very unsophisticated color render of the film type selected and those emulation modules lack a lot of nuance details that are beautifully featured in Filmpack5… The very same nuances that actually make Filmpack5 so amazing are not present in Photolab.Įven though you can make a full edited emulation in Filmpack and save/export the edit out as a preset, the Filmpack5 preset will not work in Photolab. There is workflow from Filmpack5 to Lightroom (which I just don’t get) … But not to their own photo editing program. Filmpack5 is not installed or functional in Photolab, nor is there any direct workflow from Filmpack5 to Photolab.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |